AMD Ryzen 7800X3D vs. 7900X3D vs. 7950X3D: Gaming Benchmark

We at final purchased spherical to attempting out the Ryzen 9 7900X3D, which became as soon as launched a exiguous bit over a 365 days prior to now, so the timing feels factual . All kidding apart, this became as soon as never a CPU we had been attracted to because at $600, it simply didn’t get sense. Even with out reviewing it, we already knew all we well-known to know given our ride with the 7800X3D and 7950X3D. Frankly, on the time, we had more though-provoking products to quilt, but one 365 days later and that is no longer the case, so let’s attain it.

Beforehand at $600, you had been better off procuring the 7950X3D for $700. That mere 17% stamp amplify gave you 33% more cores, and more crucially for gaming, you purchased a further two 3D V-Cache enabled cores. Alternatively, if gaming became as soon as the heart of attention, then the 7800X3D for $450 became as soon as no longer only loads more cost-effective but also guaranteed to lift better gaming efficiency because it packed eight 3D V-Cache enabled cores, whereas the 7900X3D is miniature to appropriate six.

With fresh pricing changes, things own changed in a fairly intellectual contrivance. The 7800X3D can now be had for as exiguous as $370, and the 7950X3D $580, which is near sufficient to a 20% slash value on every formula. But those don’t appear to be the biggest discounts; the 7900X3D has seen 35% slashed off its stamp, dropping it to appropriate $390, making it a mere $20 more than the 7800X3D.

Here’s having many prospective Ryzen patrons rethink the 7900X3D. The one area is there’s exiguous or no benchmark recordsdata online as this portion never had a overview program. So, we went and bought one, after which threw our battery of gaming benchmarks at it, to in finding how it compares in opposition to the 7950X3D and 7800X3D, but also the the relaxation of the Ryzen 7000 series.

For attempting out, we’re the usage of the Gigabyte X670E Aorus Grasp motherboard running the most fresh F22 BIOS, and for the reminiscence, now we own a 32GB DDR5-6000 CL30 kit. For the GPU, we’re understand that the usage of the GeForce RTX 4090 because it be the superb gadget for measuring the gaming efficiency of CPUs, and this implies we are going to also be attempting out at 1080p.

When you happen to are wondering why reviewers take a look at this contrivance and you’d opt on to study more, now we own an explainer that covers that. Now let’s salvage into the data…


First up is Baldur’s Gate 3, which has been an gorgeous title for the X3D chips. The 7800X3D, as an illustration, is 52% sooner than the 7700X in this recreation. Alternatively, whereas the non-3D V-Cache formula are reasonably linked in phrases of efficiency, the sooner X3D variants convey more variance in the outcomes. The 7800X3D and 7950X3D delivered linked efficiency, but the 7900X3D became as soon as somewhat slower, trailing by a 7% margin.

Here’s since it has fewer 3D V-Cache enabled cores, appropriate six reasonably than eight, and the recreation is configured to only traipse on the 3D V-Cache enabled cores. Out of curiosity, we disabled the non-3D V-Cache CCD on the 7900X3D, developing what would be a 7600X3D if such a portion existed, and doing so additional diminished efficiency, presumably for the explanation that 2nd CCD became as soon as being used to residence background initiatives, or with out a doubt something else no longer linked to Baldur’s Gate 3. Even so, a 7600X3D would silent be virtually 30% sooner than the 7950X in this recreation.

Transferring on to Cyberpunk 2077: Phantom Liberty, we delivery to in finding some examples of why it be hard to foretell the efficiency of those processors. The dual CCD gain of the 7950X3D prices it some efficiency right here, as the 7800X3D is up to 6% sooner. Alternatively, cutting again the 3D V-Cache core count to six additional reduces efficiency, as right here the 7900X3D became as soon as loyal for 171 fps, making it 12% slower than the 7800X3D. But when we disable the 2nd CCD on the 7900X3D, successfully developing a 7600X3D, efficiency genuinely improves by 6%, as we’re no longer paying a penalty for harmful-CCD communication, and those extra slower cores don’t appear to be precious in this title.

If reality be told, for maximum efficiency, you’d like eight 3D V-Cache enabled cores, and ideally, you’d like all of them inner the same core advanced due to scheduling no longer being perfect.

Next, now we own Hogwarts Legacy, where efficiency does give a boost to with extra cores, albeit no longer seriously. Alternatively, we’re seeing better efficiency with the 7900X3D and 7950X3D over the 7800X3D, as an illustration, and the simulated 7600X3D is slower again. We also seen linked efficiency traits with the non-3D V-Cache units. The 7900X3D became as soon as 4% sooner than the 7800X3D in this recreation, so no longer a massive margin, but that is the first example where the 12-core portion is sooner for gaming.

The Star Wars Jedi: Survivor outcomes are though-provoking, as right here the 7800X3D and 7950X3D delivered linked efficiency, with the 7950X3D appropriate 3% sooner when evaluating the smartly-liked frame rate. Alternatively, the 7800X3D became as soon as silent 11% sooner than the 7900X3D, as the recreation benefits from having eight 3D V-Cache enabled cores. This efficiency deficit wasn’t as pronounced with the slower non-3D V-Cache CPUs.

Assetto Corsa Competizione (ACC) is a recreation that doesn’t use core-heavy CPUs smartly, but it certainly does own the benefit of improved cache efficiency, and we in finding that with the X3D chips. Again, the 7800X3D and 7950X3D are very linked in phrases of efficiency, and whereas the 7900X3D is no longer always with out a doubt a ways off the trace, it did lumber a exiguous bit, coming in 4% slower than the 7800X3D. Curiously, if we disable the 2nd CCD on the 7900X3D, again developing a 7600X3D, efficiency does descend away, which became as soon as surprising in this title.

Spider-Man Remastered sees exiguous in the formula of a efficiency again with the X3D chips, though we’re the usage of ray tracing right here, which does restrict the efficiency of the RTX 4090. Alternatively, we’re silent assuredly having a thought at over 150 fps.

The 7900X3D is expounded to the 7800X3D and 7950X3D, and we leer that disabling the 2nd non-3D V-Cache enabled CCD leads to a decline in efficiency, particularly in the 1% lows.

A Plague Story: Requiem became as soon as an queer case that brought on more than about a headaches, ensuing in a couple of ravishing Windows installations so to repair the 7900X3D’s efficiency. Checking out confirmed the 7900X3D massively underperforming, to a stage that doesn’t with out a doubt get sense for about a causes. Before every thing, dual CCDs don’t seem like a area right here, as the 7950X3D matched the 7800X3D, but also having appropriate six cores with access to the 3D V-Cache doesn’t seem like a area, as disabling the 2nd CCD on the 7900X3D resulted in pretty enormous efficiency with the simulated 7600X3D.

Alternatively, it will get even more confusing as we in finding linked margins with the non-3D V-Cache formula, particularly the 7900X, which is weaker than anticipated, trailing even the 7600X, though this time the 7700X became as soon as sooner than the 7950X, indicating a dual CCD area.

The Murderer’s Creed Mirage outcomes are straightforward. With the X3D formula, having eight cores with access to the simpler L3 buffer leads to spherical a 10% efficiency boost. Then, with out the 3D V-Cache, all Zen 4 formula cap efficiency at spherical 175-176 fps no topic core count or configuration.

The same narrative unfolds when attempting out with Gape Canines: Legion. Having a further two cores with access to the 3D V-Cache boosts efficiency by spherical 15%. So, whereas you happen to are planning to amass an X3D processor for maximum gaming efficiency, ideally, you’d like a model packing eight cores per CCD.

Hitman 3 items some spirited outcomes for us. First, this recreation doesn’t seriously own the benefit of the extra L3 cache; the 7800X3D, as an illustration, is acceptable 10% sooner than the smartly-liked 7700X. We leer that the recreation can traipse at spherical 230 fps with six Zen 4 cores and spherical 240 fps with eight cores, or 260 fps whereas you happen so as to add in the 3D V-Cache. Alternatively, with appropriate six 3D V-Cache enabled cores, efficiency is capped at 245 fps. But whereas you happen to take into story scheduling components, as is the case with the 7900X3D, efficiency drops to what we in finding with the smartly-liked 7600X, so the outcomes are a form of right here.

The Counter-Strike 2 outcomes are also reasonably gorgeous, largely because there’s a noticeable efficiency uplift from the 7600X and 7700X to the dual CCD 7900X and 7950X. It appears to be like as though scheduling is working exceptionally smartly right here, with the recreation running on one CCD whereas background initiatives are running on the 2nd, seriously esteem how APO enhances Intel’s P and E-core gain.

We in finding an identical stop with the X3D formula, though right here the simulated 7600X3D is somewhat slower than the 7800X3D, as the 8-core enabled 3D V-Cache portion is able to attain new heights. Alternatively, the 7900X3D is silent sooner again, albeit by a shrimp margin.

Indirectly, now we own Name of Responsibility: Contemporary War III, and these outcomes are possibly basically the easiest to narrate that we own now seen. In short, the recreation benefits from having more cores with the dual CCD gain, and this appears to be like to be due to the scheduling working smartly. Again, the recreation runs on one CCD with every thing else sorted by the opposite, giving the 12 and 16 core formula an again, whether or no longer with or with out the 3D V-Cache.

In abstract, the 7900X3D performs smartly right here, turning in a shrimp 4% boost over the 7800X3D, though it became as soon as also appropriate 5% sooner than the smartly-liked 7900X.

Common Efficiency

Now, that is a thought on the 12-recreation average, and the outcomes are pretty unprecedented as anticipated. The 3D V-Cache seriously enhances gaming efficiency, working finest when eight cores can access the simpler L3 buffer, as is the case for the 7800X3D and 7950X3D.

The 7900X3D is no longer always with out a doubt simply about as solid in phrases of peak gaming efficiency, despite overall efficiency silent being very loyal. In any case, the 7800X3D and 7950X3D had been only spherical 7% sooner on average, though they attain appear unprecedented more impressive when in contrast with the non-3D units.

As an example, the 7800X3D became as soon as 24% sooner than the 7700X, whereas the 7900X3D became as soon as 17% sooner than the 7900X. So, there’s silent a important uplift, but no longer as enormous as one might possibly own anticipated.

What We Learned

So there it’s likely you’ll perchance own it, the outcomes overall don’t appear to be terribly gorgeous. It makes sense that the 7900X3D is no longer always with out a doubt as potent as the 7800X3D and 7950X3D for gaming. With appropriate six cores ready to access the 3D V-Cache, efficiency overall became as soon as silent gorgeous. Alternatively, there’s definitely a efficiency penalty, and whereas no longer wide, for those of you essentially gaming, the 7800X3D makes contrivance more sense.

Frankly, we own now never been that indignant by the 7950X3D. With out a doubt, every CCDs will own to silent were armed with 3D V-Cache; that might possibly were a recreation-changer. But it certainly can silent be every bit as rapid as the 7800X3D, though in some cases, it’s likely you’ll perchance want to style out the scheduling components manually with a program similar to Route of Lasso.

The 7900X3D silent has the same scheduling components as the 7950X3D, no longer decrease than in some games, with the added disadvantage of the six-core penalty. So again, whereas efficiency overall is gorgeous, it be no longer with out its quirks.

The dual CCD X3D chips had been step by step somewhat queer with appropriate one in every of the CCDs that comprises 3D V-Cache, and assuredly speaking, the simpler L3 cache is Most noteworthy for bettering CPU-miniature gaming efficiency. Though we’re determined there are utility workloads available in the market that even own the benefit of more L3, we appropriate haven’t encounter them, and admittedly, productivity attempting out is no longer the heart of attention of what step by step we attain right here.

The purpose is, basically the most optimal Zen 4 processor for gaming is the 7800X3D. It ensures maximum efficiency in all games, no longer decrease than relative to other Zen 4 processors. There are certainly examples where the 12 and 16 core units are sooner, but with a heavy reliance on AMD’s instrument scheduling, they’re somewhat all over.

This makes the 7950X3D and 7900X3D niche products, as they in fact only get sense for of us who are hooked in to gaming on their productivity workstations. Alternatively, with the 7900X3D priced at appropriate $390 factual now – the same stamp as the 7900X – you clearly wouldn’t aquire the non-3D model. Moreover, the 7950X prices $550 factual now, and that is a 40% stamp hike for a 33% amplify in core count. Then, whereas you happen to need the 7950X3D, it be virtually 50% more than the 7900X3D.

So whereas we would assuredly counsel warding off the 7900X3D, it be a seriously though-provoking portion at $390. We’re appropriate no longer determined who we would counsel it to. In case your heart of attention is gaming, then the 7800X3D is no longer only sooner but also more cost-effective, so for gaming, salvage that, and you also set up faraway from the dual CCD scheduling headaches.

The 7900X3D makes basically the most sense for productivity applications where you are usually no longer liable to own the benefit of the 3D V-Cache. But with the smartly-liked model also priced at $390, you are getting the best L3 cache for free, so why no longer? It with out a doubt is AMD’s finest value Zen 4 essentially essentially based productivity CPU factual now.

Taking a thought Shortcuts:
  • AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D on Amazon
  • AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D on Amazon
  • Intel Core i9-14900K on Amazon
  • AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D on Amazon
  • Intel Core i7-14700K on Amazon
  • Intel Core i5-14600K on Amazon
  • AMD Ryzen 9 7950X on Amazon

Read More