Expend of Video Laryngoscopy Diminished Endotracheal Intubation Makes an are attempting

— Video laryngoscopy moreover led to fewer intubation mess ups, injuries versus impart laryngoscopy

Elizabeth Brief, Workers Author, MedPage On the present time

Expend of hyperangulated video laryngoscopy diminished the option of attempts wanted to attain endotracheal intubation in contrast with impart laryngoscopy among adults present process elective or emergent surgical procedures, a cluster randomized trial showed.

At a single academic health center, a pair of intubation strive used to be required in 1.7% of the procedures wherein video laryngoscopy used to be old in contrast with 7.6% of procedures wherein impart laryngoscopy used to be old, with an estimated proportional odds ratio for the option of intubation attempts of 0.20 (95% CI 0.14-0.28, P<0.001), reported Kurt Ruetzler, MD, of the Cleveland Sanatorium, and co-authors.

Intubation failure — defined by either the clinician switching to an more than just a few laryngoscopy tool for any cause at any time or by more than three intubation attempts — occurred in 0.27% of the surgical procedures the utilization of video laryngoscopy versus 4% of these utilizing impart laryngoscopy (relative threat 0.06, 95% CI 0.03-0.14, P<0.001), they famed in JAMA.

There had been no most valuable variations between video and impart laryngoscopy for airway injuries, defined as any bleeding or apparent damage to the lips, mouth, pharynx, vocal cords, or rather about a airway constructions as recorded by the anesthesia personnel, and dental injuries, defined as an damage to the teeth as recorded by the anesthesia personnel (0.93% vs 1.1%, respectively).

“The seen improvement with video laryngoscopy will most certainly be clinically crucial, as several tidy commentary reports and randomized trials reported that a pair of intubation attempts promote complications collectively with aspiration, hypoxemia, airway damage, and even demise,” the authors wrote.

Ruetzler and colleagues famed that it’s miles going to smartly be advanced to visualize the glottis and vocal cords with impart laryngoscopy, and video laryngoscopy, which used to be presented in 2001, could give a enhance to visualization of airways but is veritably linked to prolonged and failed intubation attempts, leaving the particular impact of video laryngoscopy on easing intubation “unclear.”

For this watch, the researchers included 8,429 elective or emergent cardiac, thoracic, or vascular surgical procedures from March 2021 thru December 2022 among 7,736 adult patients who required single-lumen endotracheal intubation for overall anesthesia. Median age used to be 66, 35% had been girls folks, and 85% underwent elective surgical procedures.

Among the procedures, cardiac surgery used to be the most standard, followed by vascular surgery, rather about a surgeries, and thoracic surgery.

Two sets of 11 working rooms had been randomized on a 1-week foundation to make hyperangulated video laryngoscopy or impart laryngoscopy for the preliminary intubation strive.

Clinicians got the opportunity to peer an tutorial video on the supreme utilization of the hyperangulated trial video laryngoscope, as smartly as time to prepare and trial on manikins earlier than the job. All the attending anesthesiologists and nurse anesthetists had been required to make exhaust of the hyperangulated video laryngoscope for every and every intubation job for 2 weeks earlier than trial enrollment, and had been allowed to make exhaust of any create of overall anesthesia all the procedure thru the job.

Intubation used to be attempted with an properly sized single-lumen endotracheal tube, veritably 7.5 to 8 mm in size. For patients in the impart laryngoscopy community, stylets had been old per clinical option. For patients in the video laryngoscopy community, endotracheal tubes had been equipped with stylets. Minor exterior airway manipulations such because the backward, upward, rightward, stress utilized to the larynx maneuver, head elevation, and stress utilized to the cricoid cartilage had been allowed to give a enhance to visualization.

Ruetzler and colleagues famed that the single-center fabricate of their watch could restrict the applicability of the consequences to rather about a institutions. Other ability boundaries to the watch included the shortcoming of standardization for option of enough neuromuscular block, the actual fact that affected person positioning used to be not protocolized, and that that you just would be able to maybe presumably factor in option bias on memoir of sure exclusion criteria.

  • author['full_name']

    Elizabeth Brief is a workers author for MedPage On the present time. She incessantly covers pulmonology and hypersensitive reaction & immunology. Note


The GlideScope video laryngoscopes and GlideRite stylets had been equipped by Verathon.

The watch authors reported no conflicts of interest.

Most valuable Supply


Supply Reference: Ruetzler K, et al “Video laryngoscopy vs impart laryngoscopy for endotracheal intubation in the working room: a cluster randomized clinical trial” JAMA 2024; DOI: 10.1001/jama.2024.0762.

Read Extra